Delaware Bankruptcy Insider:
Be In The Know
About This Blog
The Delaware Bankruptcy Insider is a premier blog designed to bring its readers a comprehensive analysis of the latest Delaware corporate bankruptcy news and rulings. Brought to you by Ashby & Geddes, P.A.
Topics
Judges and Courts
- Delaware Court of Chancery
- Delaware District Court
- Delaware Supreme Court
- Judge Brendan L. Shannon
- Judge Christopher S. Sontchi
- Judge Kevin Gross
- Judge Kevin J. Carey
- Judge Laurie Selber Silverstein
- Judge Mary F. Walrath
- Judge Peter J. Walsh
- Third Circuit Court of Appeals
- Uncategorized
- United States Supreme Court
Recent Posts
- Getting Noticed in the Digital Age: Delaware Bankruptcy Court Finds Email Notice Satisfies Due Process but Not Rule 2002
- Third Circuit Reversal Paves the Way For NextEra to Potentially Recover Administrative Expenses Incurred in Connection With Failed Merger
- Delaware District Court Disagrees with Bankruptcy Court’s Ruling and Holds That Committee’s Challenge Rights Survived Entry of the Sale Order and Consummation of Sale
HELPFUL LINKS
For more information
Automatic Stay Held Not Applicable to Shareholder’s Right to Compel Shareholder Meeting
In re SS Body Armor I, Inc., No. 10-11255 (CSS), 2015 WL 1523775 (Bankr. D. Del. Apr. 1, 2015)
In this Opinion, Delaware Bankruptcy Court Judge Christopher S. Sontchi adopted previous holdings of the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and the Delaware District Court to rule that the right of a shareholder to compel a shareholder meeting for the purpose of electing a new board of directors continues during a bankruptcy proceeding unimpaired by the automatic stay. See Manville Corp. v. Equity Sec. Holders Comm. (In re Johns-Manville Corp.), 801 F.2d 60 (2d Cir. 1986); Official Bondholder Comm. v. Chase Manhatten [sic] Bank (In re Marvel Entm’t Grp., Inc.), 209 B.R. 832 (D. Del. 1997); see also NKFW Partners v. Saxon Indus., Inc., No. 7468, 1984 WL 8234 (Del. Ch. Aug. 8, 1984). The right extends to commencing state court proceedings to compel a shareholder meeting, but is not unfettered. As noted by Judge Sontchi, the bankruptcy court is entitled to enjoin a meeting or the implementation of a meeting’s results if “clear abuse” is found (i.e. a showing that the shareholders’ action to elect a new board would delay and jeopardize a debtor’s reorganization). Such injunction must be sought from either the bankruptcy court through an adversary proceeding as required by Bankruptcy Rule 7001(7) or the state court presiding over the motion to compel.