Delaware Bankruptcy Insider:
Be In The Know

About This Blog


The Delaware Bankruptcy Insider is a premier blog designed to bring its readers a comprehensive analysis of the latest Delaware corporate bankruptcy news and rulings.  Brought to you by Ashby & Geddes, P.A.

Get Updates By Email

Topics

View All Topics

Judges and Courts

View All
View less

Recent Posts

HELPFUL LINKS

For more information


Ricardo Palacio, Esq.
(302) 504-3718
rpalacio@ashbygeddes.com

Gregory A. Taylor, Esq.
(302) 504-3710
gtaylor@ashbygeddes.com

Ashby & Geddes, P.A.
500 Delaware Avenue
P.O. Box 1150
Wilmington, Delaware 19899-1150
(302) 654-1888               

Commencing an Involuntary Just Got Riskier – Petitioning Creditors May Face State Law Damages in Addition to Those Under Bankruptcy Code Section 303(i)

September 22, 2016 Posted by Karen B. Skomorucha Owens

Rosenberg v. DVI Receivables XVII, LLC, No. 15-2622, 2016 WL 4501675 (3d Cir. Aug. 29, 2016)

In this federal preemption Opinion, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals held that section 303(i) of the Bankruptcy Code does not preempt state law claims by non-debtors for damages based on the filing of an involuntary bankruptcy petition.  The Court did not, however, opine on whether section 303(i) preempts state law claims brought by debtors.

The appeal originated from a 2008 involuntary bankruptcy proceeding commenced against Maury Rosenberg and his affiliated businesses.  The petition was dismissed and Mr. Rosenberg recovered fees, costs, and $6 million in compensative and punitive damages for a bad faith filing under section 303(i).  Thereafter, Mr. Rosenberg’s wife and several associated limited partnerships (all non-debtors) brought a tortious interference claim under state law for damages allegedly caused by the involuntary filing.  The defendants moved to dismiss, arguing that the claim was preempted by the Bankruptcy Code.  The Eastern District of Pennsylvania agreed and dismissed the case.  Ultimately, however, the Third Circuit in Rosenberg reversed the lower court’s holding because the Court was unable to find adequate evidence that Congress intended section 303(i) to be an exclusive remedy for non-debtors.

While there are three forms of federal preemption of state law—express, conflict, and field—the issue in Rosenberg was limited to field preemption requiring the Court to examine whether “there is enough evidence in the text, structure, or purpose of § 303(i) or the Bankruptcy Code as a whole to rebut the presumption against preemption and say that it was Congress’s ‘clear and manifest intent’ to preempt state law causes of action for non-debtors based on the filing of an involuntary petition.”  Op. at *9.  While the Bankruptcy Code and, in particular, the text of section 303(i) are silent as to remedies for non-debtors for abuse of the bankruptcy system, the Court was not willing to infer congressional intent to deprive them of any remedy.  Moreover, the Court noted it would be inconsistent with section 303(i)’s purpose of deterring abuse to preempt state law remedies for non-debtors.  While the defendants argued that permitting non-debtor state law claims against creditors would open the flood gates of state court litigation that would chill the use of involuntary bankruptcy proceedings and risk a rewrite of bankruptcy law by state court judges, the Court was not troubled, citing the minimal cases of state law claims brought by non-debtors and relying on comity for state courts to properly account for bankruptcy law to the extent it is relevant to their decision making process.

Rosenberg v. DVI Receivables XVII, LLC (3d Cir. Aug. 29, 2016)
Addthis Share | Facebook Twitter
Tags: Involuntary Cases, Third Circuit Court of Appeals
   

Contact Author(s)

103 thoughts on “Commencing an Involuntary Just Got Riskier – Petitioning Creditors May Face State Law Damages in Addition to Those Under Bankruptcy Code Section 303(i)”

  61. When I read an article on this topic, casino online the first thought was profound and difficult, and I wondered if others could understand.. My site has a discussion board for articles and photos similar to this topic. Could you please visit me when you have time to discuss this topic?

  65. Woah! I’m really digging the template/theme of this website.
    It’s simple, yet effective. A lot of times it’s hard to get that “perfect balance” between user friendliness and appearance.

    I must say that you’ve done a fantastic job with this. Also, the blog loads very quick for me on Internet explorer.

    Exceptional Blog!

  91. I’m writing on this topic these days, safetoto, but I have stopped writing because there is no reference material. Then I accidentally found your article. I can refer to a variety of materials, so I think the work I was preparing will work! Thank you for your efforts.

  99. With havin so much written content do you ever run into
    any issues of plagorism or copyright violation? My site has a lot of completely unique content
    I’ve either written myself or outsourced but it looks like a lot of it is popping it up all over the internet without my agreement.
    Do you know any techniques to help stop content from being stolen? I’d certainly appreciate
    it.

Leave a Reply