Delaware Bankruptcy Insider:
Be In The Know
About This Blog
The Delaware Bankruptcy Insider is a premier blog designed to bring its readers a comprehensive analysis of the latest Delaware corporate bankruptcy news and rulings. Brought to you by Ashby & Geddes, P.A.
Topics
Judges and Courts
- Delaware Court of Chancery
- Delaware District Court
- Delaware Supreme Court
- Judge Brendan L. Shannon
- Judge Christopher S. Sontchi
- Judge Kevin Gross
- Judge Kevin J. Carey
- Judge Laurie Selber Silverstein
- Judge Mary F. Walrath
- Judge Peter J. Walsh
- Third Circuit Court of Appeals
- Uncategorized
- United States Supreme Court
Recent Posts
- Getting Noticed in the Digital Age: Delaware Bankruptcy Court Finds Email Notice Satisfies Due Process but Not Rule 2002
- Third Circuit Reversal Paves the Way For NextEra to Potentially Recover Administrative Expenses Incurred in Connection With Failed Merger
- Delaware District Court Disagrees with Bankruptcy Court’s Ruling and Holds That Committee’s Challenge Rights Survived Entry of the Sale Order and Consummation of Sale
HELPFUL LINKS
For more information
Delaware District Court Finds Section 506(b) Does Not Limit Allowability of Unsecured Claims for Contractual Postpetition Attorneys’ Fees
In a short Memorandum Order, the Delaware District Court reversed the Delaware Bankruptcy Court’s November 19, 2015 ruling issued in the chapter 11 cases of Tribune Media Company and its affiliated debtors disallowing an indenture trustee’s unsecured claim for postpetition attorneys’ fees arising under the express terms of the governing indenture. As previously analyzed by the Delaware Bankruptcy Insider, the Bankruptcy Court acknowledged that the allowability under section 502(b) of the Bankruptcy Code of contractual postpetition attorneys’ fees claimed by an unsecured creditor is an issue undecided by the Third Circuit Court of Appeals and one that has caused division among lower courts. In support of its disallowance decision, the Bankruptcy Court relied in part on section 506(b) of the Bankruptcy Code, which permits an oversecured creditor to recover postpetition attorneys’ fees, holding that such provision implicitly eliminates an unsecured creditor’s right to do so. While on appeal the District Court recognized this canon of statutory construction (i.e. expressio unius est exclusio alterius – the express mention of one thing excludes all others), the Court simply held that it could not conclude section 506(b) expressly disallows the indenture trustee’s unsecured contractual claim for postpetition attorneys’ fees and thus, reversed and remanded the proceedings to the Bankruptcy Court for further consideration.