Delaware Bankruptcy Insider:
Be In The Know
About This Blog
The Delaware Bankruptcy Insider is a premier blog designed to bring its readers a comprehensive analysis of the latest Delaware corporate bankruptcy news and rulings. Brought to you by Ashby & Geddes, P.A.
Topics
Judges and Courts
- Delaware Court of Chancery
- Delaware District Court
- Delaware Supreme Court
- Judge Brendan L. Shannon
- Judge Christopher S. Sontchi
- Judge Kevin Gross
- Judge Kevin J. Carey
- Judge Laurie Selber Silverstein
- Judge Mary F. Walrath
- Judge Peter J. Walsh
- Third Circuit Court of Appeals
- Uncategorized
- United States Supreme Court
Recent Posts
- Delaware District Court Disagrees with Bankruptcy Court’s Ruling and Holds That Committee’s Challenge Rights Survived Entry of the Sale Order and Consummation of Sale
- “Straddling the Line”: Delaware Bankruptcy Court Rules That Not All Tax Liabilities Incurred During a Debtor’s Petition Year are Eligible for Administrative Expense Priority
- Insider’s Scoop: Judge Silverstein Imposes Heightened Standard Regarding Appointment of Future Claims Representative
HELPFUL LINKS
For more information
Third Circuit Holds That Layoffs Must Be Probable (Not Just Possible) for WARN Act Liability
Varela v. AE Liquidation, Inc. (f/k/a Eclipse Aviation Corp.) (In re AE Liquidation, Inc.), No. 16-2203, 2017 WL 3319963 (3d Cir. Aug. 4, 2017)
As we have discussed prior, under the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act, employers may be liable if they do not give fair warning to their employees before a mass layoff. Liability can be avoided if, among other things, the “mass layoff is caused by business circumstances that were not reasonably foreseeable at the time that notice would have been required.” 20 C.F.R. § 2102(b)(2)(A). The question for the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in this appeal was what makes a business circumstance “reasonably foreseeable.” Does an event need to be “probable” (i.e. more likely than not) or simply “possible”? Every Circuit Court deciding the issue as well as the Delaware District Court and the Delaware Bankruptcy Court have adopted the probability standard, and by this Opinion, the Third Circuit joined the club. In doing so, the Court noted that the probability standard strikes the appropriate balance of the WARN Act’s employee protections and employer burdens and also highlighted a concerning result if the lower threshold “possibility” test was adopted. More specifically, because it is quite possible that a company in financial distress will close or effect a layoff, every company in or near bankruptcy would be forced to send a WARN notice to their employees that is not only costly, but also likely to cause panic and accelerate their own demise. As explained by the Court, the WARN Act was not meant to impose such a burden on an employer and thus, “a layoff becomes reasonably foreseeable only when it becomes more likely than not that it will occur.” Op. at *11.